科学家们正在研究一种特定竹子的生长情况。他们希望了解竹茎的高度随时间的变化。下表显示了竹茎在发芽后年龄为 tt 周时的绝对高度 hh 英寸。
tt12345789
hh3.67.410.211.712.614.114.515.5

  1. (a)

    绘制这些数据的散点图,并结合图形解释为什么 hh 和 tt 之间的关系不能很好地用 h=a+bth = a + bt 或 h=a+bt2h = a + bt^2(其中 b>0b > 0)形式的方程来建模。

  2. (b)

    考虑以下两个模型:

    Model A:h=c+dt,\text{Model } A: h = c + d\sqrt{t},
    Model B:h=c+dln⁡t,\text{Model } B: h = c + d\ln t,

    其中 cc 和 dd 为常数。解释模型 AA 和模型 BB 中哪一个能更好地拟合数据。说明此时的最小二乘回归线方程,结果保留 3 位小数。

  3. (c)

    利用你在 (b) 中得到的回归线方程,估计一株 6 周大竹茎的长度。评价该估计值的可靠性。

  4. (d)

    评价长期使用该模型的适用性。

  5. (e)

    设 HH 表示利用 (b) 中得到的最小二乘回归线计算得出的表中每个 tt 值对应的竹茎高度。求 SS 的值,其中 S=∑(h−H)2S = \sum (h - H)^2,结果保留 2 位小数。

  6. (f)

    对于 tt 的八个样本值中的每一个,H′H' 由 H′=p+qln⁡tH' = p + q\ln t 给出,其中 pp 和 qq 是常数。∑(h−H′)2\sum (h - H')^2 会比 SS 大还是小?为什么?

先不看答案,让 AI 诊断你卡在哪里?

它不会直接告诉你答案,而是问你卡在哪一步看看 AI 是怎么陪你一步步弄懂这道题的

完整解法

10(a)

1. Draw the scatter diagram on a coordinate grid.

Set up a Cartesian plane with the horizontal axis as tt (from 0 to 10) and the vertical axis as hh (from 0 to 16). Plot the coordinates (1,3.6)(1, 3.6), (2,7.4)(2, 7.4), (3,10.2)(3, 10.2), (4,11.7)(4, 11.7), (5,12.6)(5, 12.6), (7,14.1)(7, 14.1), (8,14.5)(8, 14.5), and (9,15.5)(9, 15.5).

2. Explain why $h = a + bt$ is not a suitable model.

From the scatter diagram, the plotted points form a curve where the gradient decreases as tt increases. The equation h=a+bth = a + bt represents a straight line graph with a constant gradient (rate of increase). Since the points do not follow a linear trend, this model is not suitable.

3. Explain why $h = a + bt^2$ is not a suitable model.

The equation h=a+bt2h = a + bt^2 (with b>0b > 0) implies an increasing gradient, where hh would increase at an increasing rate (a curve that opens upwards). However, the scatter diagram clearly shows hh increasing at a decreasing rate (a curve that is concave downwards). Thus, this model is also not suitable.

答案

(Graph plotted correctly)
From the scatter diagram, hh increases at a decreasing rate as tt increases (the curve is concave downwards). However, h=a+bth = a + bt models a constant rate of increase (a straight line), and h=a+bt2h = a + bt^2 with b>0b > 0 models an increasing rate of increase (a curve that is concave upwards). Therefore, neither equation models the relationship well.

10(b)

1. Calculate the product moment correlation coefficient ($r$) for both models using a graphing calculator.

Let rAr_A and rBr_B be the product moment correlation coefficients for Model A and Model B respectively.
Using a graphing calculator:
For Model A (hh on t\sqrt{t}): rA≈0.9736r_A \approx 0.9736
For Model B (hh on ln⁡t\ln t): rB≈0.9966r_B \approx 0.9966

2. Compare the correlation coefficients to determine which model is a better fit.

Since the value of ∣rB∣|r_B| is closer to 11 than ∣rA∣|r_A|, Model B provides a stronger linear correlation.
Therefore, Model B is a better fit to the data.

3. State the equation of the least squares regression line for the chosen model to 3 decimal places.

For Model B (hh on ln⁡t\ln t), the graphing calculator gives the regression line parameters:
c≈3.89017c \approx 3.89017
d≈5.31137d \approx 5.31137
Rounding to 3 decimal places, the equation is:
h=3.890+5.311ln⁡th = 3.890 + 5.311\ln t

答案

Model B is a better fit because its correlation coefficient (r≈0.9966r \approx 0.9966) is closer to 11 than that of Model A (r≈0.9736r \approx 0.9736).

The equation of the least squares regression line is h=3.890+5.311ln⁡th = 3.890 + 5.311\ln t.

10(c)

1. Obtain the regression line from (b) and substitute $t = 6$ to estimate the height.

From (b), using a graphing calculator to find the correlation coefficients for the two models:

  • Model A (hh on t\sqrt{t}): r≈0.9735r \approx 0.9735
  • Model B (hh on ln⁡t\ln t): r≈0.9966r \approx 0.9966

Since ∣r∣|r| is closer to 11 for Model B, it is the better fit. The least squares regression line (given to 3 d.p. as required in (b)) is h=3.890+5.311ln⁡th = 3.890 + 5.311 \ln t.

Substitute t=6t = 6 to estimate the length:
h=3.890+5.311ln⁡6h = 3.890 + 5.311 \ln 6
h≈13.406h \approx 13.406

The estimated length of a 6-week-old bamboo stalk is 13.413.4 inches (to 3 s.f.).

2. Comment on the reliability of the estimate.

The estimate is reliable because t=6t = 6 lies within the range of the given data (1≤t≤91 \le t \le 9), meaning this is an interpolation, and the chosen model has a strong correlation to the data (r≈0.997r \approx 0.997).

答案

Estimated length: 13.413.4 inches
Reliability: The estimate is reliable because it is an interpolation and the model fits the data well.

10(d)

1. Comment on the long-term behaviour of the model compared to the real-world context

As t→∞t \to \infty, h→∞h \to \infty. According to the model, the height of the bamboo stalk would increase indefinitely to infinity, which is impossible in reality as it will eventually reach a maximum height. Thus, the model is not suitable in the long run.

答案

The model is not suitable in the long run because as t→∞t \to \infty, h→∞h \to \infty, but the height of a bamboo stalk cannot increase indefinitely.

10(e)

1. Formulate the expression for the sum of squared residuals using the previously obtained regression line.

S=∑(h−H)2S = \sum (h - H)^2
Using the least squares regression line obtained in (b), where H=3.890+5.311ln⁡tH = 3.890 + 5.311\ln t, the sum required is the residual sum of squares.

2. Evaluate the sum using a graphing calculator.

Using the graphing calculator's statistical operations to find the sum of squared residuals for the regression of hh on ln⁡t\ln t:
S≈0.7732S \approx 0.7732
S=0.77 (to 2 d.p.)S = 0.77 \text{ (to 2 d.p.)}

答案

0.770.77

10(f)

1. State the least squares property to compare the sum of squared residuals.

The least squares regression line H=c+dln⁡tH = c + d\ln t is mathematically derived to minimise the sum of the squares of the residuals, S=∑(h−H)2S = \sum (h - H)^2. For any other arbitrary constants pp and qq used in a different model H′=p+qln⁡tH' = p + q\ln t, the sum of squared residuals ∑(h−H′)2\sum (h - H')^2 must be greater than (or equal to) the minimum value SS.

答案

Greater. The least squares regression line minimises the sum of the squares of the residuals.

AI 分析,可能出错

用 AI 批改,圈出写错的那一步,并自动将你的薄弱点存入错题本,形成你的错因库。

同一知识点的其他题

  1. 1一位教师对7名学生进行了调查,以研究每周“屏幕时间”小时数(hh)与他们在最近结束的考试中获得的平均分数(ss)之间的关系。她将自己的调查结果记录在下表中。 已知 ss 对 hh 的回归线为 s=−3.00799h+100.27974s = -3.00799h + 100.27974…
  2. 2下表给出了某员工在公司工作的年数(xx)以及该员工获得的相应薪资增幅(以美元计,yy)。 | 年数, xx | 6 | 7 | 9 | 11 | 13 | 15 | 18 | |---|---|---|---|---|---|---|…
  3. 3据信,随机选择的孕妇生育唐氏综合征患儿的概率 pp 与孕妇的年龄 xx(以岁为单位)相关。下表给出了 5 个不同的 xx 值所对应的 pp 的观测值。 | xx | 25 | 30 | 35 | 40 | 45 | |---|--…
  4. 4在一项实验中,记录了 1 kg 冰块在 7 种预设温度 θ∘C\theta^\circ\text{C} 下完全融化所需的时间 TT 分钟,如下表所示。 艾伯特(Albert)分析了这些数据并得出以下结论: 积矩相关系数,r=−0.88316r = -0.88316…
  5. 5一家电器供应商正在调查在流行社交媒体平台 SnapGram 上的月度广告支出(记为 xx,单位为千美元)对其月销售利润(记为 yy,单位为千美元)的潜在影响。该供应商收集了过去一年中的以下数据。 这组数据被认为可以用以下方程之一进行建模…