一位教师对7名学生进行了调查,以研究每周“屏幕时间”小时数(hh)与他们在最近结束的考试中获得的平均分数(ss)之间的关系。她将自己的调查结果记录在下表中。

  1. (a)

    已知 ss 对 hh 的回归线为 s=−3.00799h+100.27974s = -3.00799h + 100.27974,证明 α=67.0\alpha = 67.0。

  2. (b)

    绘制该数据的散点图。

  3. (c)

    给出适当的理由,解释为什么相比于 (a) 部分中的模型, s=kh2+cs = kh^2 + c 是更好的模型。写出 kk 和 cc 的值。

  4. (d)

    使用更好的模型,估计如果一个学生每周花7个小时的屏幕时间,他可以期望获得的分数。对所得估计值的可靠性进行评价。

  5. (e)

    教师从她的调查结果中观察到一个趋势,并得出结论:屏幕时间的增加会导致考试分数下降。评述这一结论的合理性。

先不看答案,让 AI 诊断你卡在哪里?

它不会直接告诉你答案,而是问你卡在哪一步看看 AI 是怎么陪你一步步弄懂这道题的

完整解法

9(a)

1. Find the mean of the $h$ values

hˉ=8.5+14+20+27+10.5+17+237=1207=17.142857…\bar{h}=\frac{8.5+14+20+27+10.5+17+23}{7}=\frac{120}{7}=17.142857\ldots

2. Use the line through the mean point to find $\bar{s}$ and hence $\sum s$

The regression line of ss on hh passes through (hˉ,sˉ)(\bar{h},\bar{s}), so
sˉ=−3.00799(17.142857…)+100.27974=48.714…\bar{s}=-3.00799(17.142857\ldots)+100.27974=48.714\ldots
∑s=7sˉ=7(48.714…)=341.0\sum s = 7\bar{s}=7(48.714\ldots)=341.0

3. Subtract the six known scores to obtain $\alpha$

Sum of the six known scores =68+61+44+12+58+31=274=68+61+44+12+58+31=274.
α=∑s−274=341.0−274=67.0\alpha=\sum s-274=341.0-274=67.0

答案

α=67.0\alpha = 67.0 (to 3 s.f.)

9(b)

1. Set up axes with appropriate scales and labels

Draw a set of axes on graph paper. Label the horizontal axis as hh (number of hours of screen-time) and the vertical axis as ss (average score). Choose a suitable scale that covers the entire range of data (e.g., 00 to 3030 for hh and 00 to 7070 for ss).

2. Plot the given data points

Carefully plot the given 7 pairs of values as coordinate points (h,s)(h, s) on the axes:

(8.5,68)(8.5, 68), (10.5,67)(10.5, 67), (14,61)(14, 61), (17,58)(17, 58), (20,44)(20, 44), (23,31)(23, 31), (27,12)(27, 12).

答案

A scatter diagram with hh on the horizontal axis and ss on the vertical axis, showing the 7 plotted points.

9(c)

1. Evaluate and compare the product moment correlation coefficients ($r$) of both models to justify the better fit.

Using a graphing calculator to find rr:
For the linear model s=mh+cs = mh + c (part a), r≈−0.961r \approx -0.961.
For the model s=kh2+cs = kh^2 + c, we use the data points (h2,s)(h^2, s):
h2h^2: 72.25,110.25,196,289,400,529,72972.25, 110.25, 196, 289, 400, 529, 729
ss: 68,67,61,58,44,31,1268, 67, 61, 58, 44, 31, 12
For ss on h2h^2, r≈−0.991r \approx -0.991.

Since the correlation coefficient for s=kh2+cs = kh^2 + c (r≈−0.991r \approx -0.991) is closer to −1-1 than that of s=mh+cs = mh + c, the points (h2,s)(h^2, s) lie closer to a straight line. Thus, s=kh2+cs = kh^2 + c is the better model.

(Note: Explaining that the scatter diagram plotted in part (b) exhibits a downward curve with a non-constant gradient, making a non-linear quadratic model more appropriate, is also an acceptable valid reason).

2. Find the values of $k$ and $c$ using linear regression on the transformed variables.

Using the graphing calculator to perform linear regression of ss on h2h^2:
s=kh2+cs = kh^2 + c
k≈−0.08733k \approx -0.08733
c≈77.727c \approx 77.727

Rounding to 3 significant figures:
k=−0.0873k = -0.0873
c=77.7c = 77.7

答案

The model s=kh2+cs = kh^2 + c is better because its product moment correlation coefficient r≈−0.991r \approx -0.991 is closer to −1-1 than that of the linear model (r≈−0.961r \approx -0.961).
k=−0.0873k = -0.0873, c=77.7c = 77.7

9(d)

1. Calculate the estimated score using the model from part (c)

Using the equation s=kh2+cs = kh^2 + c found in part (c), where k≈−0.087288k \approx -0.087288 and c≈77.713c \approx 77.713:
s=−0.087288(7)2+77.713s = -0.087288(7)^2 + 77.713
s=−0.087288(49)+77.713s = -0.087288(49) + 77.713
s≈73.436s \approx 73.436
s≈73.4 (to 3 s.f.)s \approx 73.4 \text{ (to 3 s.f.)}

2. Comment on the reliability of the estimate

The value h=7h = 7 is outside the range of given data values for screen-time (8.5≤h≤278.5 \le h \le 27).
Since this is an extrapolation, the estimate obtained is unreliable.

答案

73.473.4 (to 3 s.f.)
Unreliable as it is an extrapolation.

9(e)

1. State whether the statement is valid and provide the statistical reasoning.

The statement is not valid. Correlation does not imply causation; there could be other factors affecting the exam scores.

答案

The statement is not valid. An observed trend (correlation) does not imply causation; there could be other factors affecting the exam scores.

AI 分析,可能出错

用 AI 批改,圈出写错的那一步,并自动将你的薄弱点存入错题本,形成你的错因库。

同一知识点的其他题

  1. 1下表给出了某员工在公司工作的年数(xx)以及该员工获得的相应薪资增幅(以美元计,yy)。 | 年数, xx | 6 | 7 | 9 | 11 | 13 | 15 | 18 | |---|---|---|---|---|---|---|…
  2. 2据信,随机选择的孕妇生育唐氏综合征患儿的概率 pp 与孕妇的年龄 xx(以岁为单位)相关。下表给出了 5 个不同的 xx 值所对应的 pp 的观测值。 | xx | 25 | 30 | 35 | 40 | 45 | |---|--…
  3. 3在一项实验中,记录了 1 kg 冰块在 7 种预设温度 θ∘C\theta^\circ\text{C} 下完全融化所需的时间 TT 分钟,如下表所示。 艾伯特(Albert)分析了这些数据并得出以下结论: 积矩相关系数,r=−0.88316r = -0.88316…
  4. 4一家电器供应商正在调查在流行社交媒体平台 SnapGram 上的月度广告支出(记为 xx,单位为千美元)对其月销售利润(记为 yy,单位为千美元)的潜在影响。该供应商收集了过去一年中的以下数据。 这组数据被认为可以用以下方程之一进行建模…
  5. 5一位研究人员正在调查学生的考试成绩与他们在考试前一周的日均睡眠时间之间的关系。下表给出了 9 名学生的日均睡眠时间(tt 小时)和他们的考试成绩(xx,满分 100 分)。 | tt | 5.5 | 5.8 | 6.1 | 6.5 |…