A random sample of 27 individuals from a population of young men aged 18 was chosen and the length of the right foot of each individual was measured to the nearest centimetre. The data is as given in the table below.

  1. Use this data to test if the mean foot length of an 18 year old man is more than 27 cm at 2% level of significance, stating any assumptions you have made.

  2. A random sample of 60 individuals from a population of young women aged 18 have foot lengths summarised as x‾=26.6\overline{x}=26.6 and ∑(x−x‾)2=123.20\sum (x-\overline{x})^{2}=123.20. The mean foot length of an 18 year old women is claimed to be kk. Find the range of values for kk given that this claim is rejected at the 4% level of significance.

Work through it with AI →

It won't just hand you the answer — it asks where you're stuck.How the checker works

Worked solution

11[0]

1. State the null and alternative hypotheses.

Let μ\mu be the population mean foot length of an 18 year old man.
H0:μ=27H_0: \mu = 27
H1:μ>27H_1: \mu > 27

2. Calculate the sample mean and the unbiased estimate of the population variance.

From the frequency table, n=27n = 27.
∑x=24(1)+25(2)+26(3)+27(9)+28(6)+29(5)+30(1)=738\sum x = 24(1) + 25(2) + 26(3) + 27(9) + 28(6) + 29(5) + 30(1) = 738
∑x2=242(1)+252(2)+262(3)+272(9)+282(6)+292(5)+302(1)=20224\sum x^2 = 24^2(1) + 25^2(2) + 26^2(3) + 27^2(9) + 28^2(6) + 29^2(5) + 30^2(1) = 20224

Sample mean, xˉ=73827=823≈27.333\bar{x} = \frac{738}{27} = \frac{82}{3} \approx 27.333

Unbiased estimate of population variance, s2=1n−1(∑x2−(∑x)2n)s^2 = \frac{1}{n-1}\left(\sum x^2 - \frac{(\sum x)^2}{n}\right)
s2=126(20224−738227)=126(20224−20172)=5226=2s^2 = \frac{1}{26}\left(20224 - \frac{738^2}{27}\right) = \frac{1}{26}(20224 - 20172) = \frac{52}{26} = 2

3. State the necessary assumptions for the hypothesis test.

Since the sample size n=27n = 27 is small (n<30n < 30), we must assume that the population of foot lengths of 18 year old men is normally distributed.
(Additionally, we assume the unknown population variance σ2\sigma^2 is approximately equal to the sample variance s2=2s^2 = 2).

4. Calculate the test statistic and $p$-value using a graphing calculator.

Under H0H_0, the test statistic is Z=Xˉ−μs/n∼N(0,1)Z = \frac{\bar{X} - \mu}{s/\sqrt{n}} \sim N(0,1) approximately.
Using a graphing calculator (Z-Test):
z≈1.22z \approx 1.22
p-value=P(Z>1.2247)≈0.110p\text{-value} = P(Z > 1.2247) \approx 0.110

5. State the conclusion of the test in the context of the question.

Since p-value=0.110>0.02p\text{-value} = 0.110 > 0.02, we do not reject H0H_0.
There is insufficient evidence at the 2%2\% level of significance to conclude that the mean foot length of an 18 year old man is more than 27 cm27\text{ cm}.

Answer

Do not reject H0H_0. There is insufficient evidence at the 2% level of significance to conclude that the mean foot length of an 18 year old man is more than 27 cm27\text{ cm}.

11[1]

1. Calculate the unbiased estimate of the population variance, $s^2$.

s2=1n−1∑(x−x‾)2=160−1(123.20)=123.2059=616295≈2.0881s^2 = \frac{1}{n-1}\sum (x-\overline{x})^2 = \frac{1}{60-1}(123.20) = \frac{123.20}{59} = \frac{616}{295} \approx 2.0881

2. State the hypotheses and determine the test statistic.

Let μ\mu be the population mean foot length of an 18-year-old woman.
H0:μ=kH_0: \mu = k
H1:μ≠kH_1: \mu \neq k
Since n=60≥30n = 60 \ge 30, by the Central Limit Theorem, the sample mean X‾\overline{X} is approximately normally distributed. Under H0H_0, the test statistic is:
Z=X‾−ks/n∼N(0,1) approximately.Z = \frac{\overline{X} - k}{s/\sqrt{n}} \sim N(0,1) \text{ approximately.}

3. Identify the critical region for a 4% level of significance.

For a two-tailed test at the 4% level of significance, the critical regions are Z<−z0.02Z < -z_{0.02} or Z>z0.02Z > z_{0.02}.
From the standard normal distribution, z0.02≈2.0537z_{0.02} \approx 2.0537.
Thus, we reject H0H_0 if ∣Z∣>2.0537|Z| > 2.0537.

4. Formulate the inequality and solve for the range of values for $k$.

∣26.6−k616295×60∣>2.0537\left| \frac{26.6 - k}{\sqrt{\frac{616}{295 \times 60}}} \right| > 2.0537
∣26.6−k∣0.18655>2.0537\frac{|26.6 - k|}{0.18655} > 2.0537
∣26.6−k∣>0.3831|26.6 - k| > 0.3831
This gives 26.6−k>0.383126.6 - k > 0.3831 or 26.6−k<−0.383126.6 - k < -0.3831.
k<26.2169ork>26.9831k < 26.2169 \quad \text{or} \quad k > 26.9831
Rounding to 3 significant figures, k<26.2k < 26.2 or k>27.0k > 27.0.

Answer

k<26.2k < 26.2 or k>27.0k > 27.0 (to 3 s.f.)

AI analysis — may contain mistakes.

Worked this one out on paper? Snap your steps and Gigle's AI math checker will circle the step where it went wrong.

More questions on this topic

  1. 1A nutritionist claims that the mean number of calories in an energy bar is 350 cal. The nutritionist collected and measu…
  2. 2The owner of Eng Choo Farm claims that the eggs produced at his farm has an average cholesterol content of μ0\mu_0 mg pe…
  3. 3A study1^1 found that students at the National University of Singapore and the Nanyang Technological University sleep a…
  4. 4A bakery claims that the mass of a cake, on average, is 600 grams each. A random sample of 10 cakes is examined and the…
  5. 5Mr Dough's factory produces packets of flour for sale in local supermarkets packed in 2 sizes -- Regular-sized packets a…