An insurance company declares that the mean payment made on motor insurance claims is $10 000. The auditor examines a random sample of 25 claims and records the payment made for each claim. The payments, $ xx, are summarised by ∑(x−10 000)=−6560and∑(x−10 000)2=7 493 500.\sum(x - 10\ 000) = -6560 \quad \text{and} \quad \sum(x - 10\ 000)^2 = 7\ 493\ 500.

  1. (i)

    Stating any necessary assumptions, test whether the mean payment made is less than $10 000 at the 1% significance level.

  2. (ii)

    Explain the meaning of "at the 1% significance level" in the context of the question.

  3. (iii)

    Without carrying out any further hypothesis tests, state with a reason whether the conclusion in part (i) would be the same if a two-tailed test is carried out at the same significance level.

  4. (iv)

    Suppose now that the standard deviation of the payments made on motor insurance claims is known to be $500, and that any assumptions made in part (i) are still valid.

    Find the largest value of the mean payment made that the insurance company should declare so that it will not be rejected as an overestimate at the 5% significance level, giving your answer correct to the nearest dollar.

Work through it with AI →

It won't just hand you the answer — it asks where you're stuck.How the checker works

Worked solution

10(i)

1. Calculate the sample mean and the unbiased estimate of the population variance.

Let y=x−10 000y = x - 10\ 000.
Given n=25n = 25, ∑y=−6560\sum y = -6560 and ∑y2=7 493 500\sum y^2 = 7\ 493\ 500.

Sample mean,
xˉ=10 000+∑yn=10 000+−656025=9737.6\bar{x} = 10\ 000 + \frac{\sum y}{n} = 10\ 000 + \frac{-6560}{25} = 9737.6

Unbiased estimate of population variance,
s2=1n−1(∑y2−(∑y)2n)s^2 = \frac{1}{n-1} \left( \sum y^2 - \frac{(\sum y)^2}{n} \right)
s2=124(7 493 500−(−6560)225)s^2 = \frac{1}{24} \left( 7\ 493\ 500 - \frac{(-6560)^2}{25} \right)
s2=240 506.5s^2 = 240\ 506.5

2. State the necessary assumptions, as well as the null and alternative hypotheses.

Assumptions:

  1. The population of payments made on motor insurance claims follows a normal distribution.
  2. The population variance is assumed to be equal to the sample unbiased estimate s2s^2.

Let μ\mu be the population mean payment.
Null hypothesis, H0:μ=10 000H_0: \mu = 10\ 000
Alternative hypothesis, H1:μ<10 000H_1: \mu < 10\ 000

3. Compute the test statistic and the $p$-value.

Level of significance: 1%1\%

Since n=25n = 25 is small and the population variance is unknown, under the assumptions made, we use the test statistic Z≈Xˉ−10 000s/n∼N(0,1)Z \approx \frac{\bar{X} - 10\ 000}{s / \sqrt{n}} \sim N(0, 1).

z=9737.6−10 000240 506.5/25=−2.6753 (to 5 s.f.)z = \frac{9737.6 - 10\ 000}{\sqrt{240\ 506.5} / \sqrt{25}} = -2.6753 \text{ (to 5 s.f.)}

Using a graphing calculator,
p-value=P(Z≤−2.6753)≈0.00373p\text{-value} = P(Z \le -2.6753) \approx 0.00373

4. State the conclusion of the test in the context of the question.

Since p-value=0.00373<0.01p\text{-value} = 0.00373 < 0.01, we reject H0H_0.

There is sufficient evidence at the 1%1\% significance level to conclude that the mean payment made is less than $10 000\char36{}10\ 000.

Answer

Assumptions:

  1. The payments made on motor insurance claims are normally distributed.
  2. The population variance is equal to the sample unbiased estimate s2s^2.

Estimates:
xˉ=9737.6\bar{x} = 9737.6
s2=240 506.5s^2 = 240\ 506.5

Hypotheses:
H0:μ=10 000H_0: \mu = 10\ 000
H1:μ<10 000H_1: \mu < 10\ 000

Test Results:
p-value≈0.00373p\text{-value} \approx 0.00373

Conclusion:
Since p-value<0.01p\text{-value} < 0.01, reject H0H_0. There is sufficient evidence at the 1%1\% significance level to conclude that the mean payment made is less than $10 000\char36{}10\ 000.

10(ii)

1. State the meaning of the 1% significance level in the context of the given hypotheses

The 1%1\% significance level represents the probability of making a Type I error, which is rejecting the null hypothesis (H0:μ=10 000H_0: \mu = 10\,000) when it is actually true.

In context: There is a 1%1\% probability of concluding that the mean payment made on motor insurance claims is less than $10 000\char36{}10\,000, when the true mean payment is actually exactly $10 000\char36{}10\,000.

Answer

There is a 1%1\% probability of concluding that the mean payment made on motor insurance claims is less than $10 000\char36{}10\,000, when the true mean payment is actually $10 000\char36{}10\,000.

10(iii)

1. Concisely calculate the sample mean, unbiased estimate of variance, and the $p$-value for the one-tailed test from part (i).

To state the reason without further tests, we rely on the results calculated in part (i). Let y=x−10 000y = x - 10\,000.
xˉ=10 000+−656025=9737.6\bar{x} = 10\,000 + \frac{-6560}{25} = 9737.6
s2=124(7 493 500−(−6560)225)=240 506.5s^2 = \frac{1}{24}\left(7\,493\,500 - \frac{(-6560)^2}{25}\right) = 240\,506.5
Under H0:μ=10 000H_0: \mu = 10\,000, using a tt-test (n=25n=25, unknown population variance), the test statistic is:
t=9737.6−10 000240 506.5/25≈−2.6753t = \frac{9737.6 - 10\,000}{\sqrt{240\,506.5/25}} \approx -2.6753
With 2424 degrees of freedom, the pp-value for the one-tailed test (H1:μ<10 000H_1: \mu < 10\,000) is 0.0067620.006762.

2. Deduce the $p$-value for the two-tailed test and determine if the conclusion changes.

For a two-tailed test, the new pp-value is doubled:
New p-value=2×0.006762=0.0135 (to 3 s.f.)\text{New } p\text{-value} = 2 \times 0.006762 = 0.0135 \text{ (to 3 s.f.)}
Since 0.0135>0.010.0135 > 0.01 (the 1%1\% significance level), we do not reject H0H_0.
This contradicts the conclusion in part (i), where H0H_0 was rejected (0.006762<0.010.006762 < 0.01). Therefore, the conclusion would not be the same.

Answer

No, the conclusion would not be the same. The pp-value for the two-tailed test is 2imes0.00676=0.01352 imes 0.00676 = 0.0135, which is greater than the 0.010.01 significance level, meaning the null hypothesis is no longer rejected.

10(iv)

1. Calculate the sample mean $\bar{x}$ from the given summary statistics.

xˉ=10000+∑(x−10000)25=10000+−656025=9737.6\bar{x} = 10000 + \frac{\sum(x - 10000)}{25} = 10000 + \frac{-6560}{25} = 9737.6

2. Set up the condition for the null hypothesis not to be rejected at the 5% significance level.

Let μ0\mu_0 be the declared mean payment. The auditor tests H0:μ=μ0H_0: \mu = \mu_0 against H1:μ<μ0H_1: \mu < \mu_0 (testing for an overestimate).
For the claim not to be rejected at the 5% significance level, the test statistic zz must be greater than or equal to the critical value −1.64485-1.64485 (since it is a left-tailed test).

Z=xˉ−μ0σ/n≥−1.64485Z = \frac{\bar{x} - \mu_0}{\sigma / \sqrt{n}} \ge -1.64485

3. Substitute the known values to find the largest value of $\mu_0$.

Using σ=500\sigma = 500 and n=25n = 25:
9737.6−μ0500/25≥−1.64485\frac{9737.6 - \mu_0}{500 / \sqrt{25}} \ge -1.64485
9737.6−μ0100≥−1.64485\frac{9737.6 - \mu_0}{100} \ge -1.64485
9737.6−μ0≥−164.4859737.6 - \mu_0 \ge -164.485
μ0≤9737.6+164.485\mu_0 \le 9737.6 + 164.485
μ0≤9902.085\mu_0 \le 9902.085

To the nearest dollar, the largest declared mean is $9902\char36{}9902.

Answer

$9902

AI analysis — may contain mistakes.

Worked this one out on paper? Snap your steps and Gigle's AI math checker will circle the step where it went wrong.

More questions on this topic

  1. 1A nutritionist claims that the mean number of calories in an energy bar is 350 cal. The nutritionist collected and measu…
  2. 2The owner of Eng Choo Farm claims that the eggs produced at his farm has an average cholesterol content of μ0\mu_0 mg pe…
  3. 3A study1^1 found that students at the National University of Singapore and the Nanyang Technological University sleep a…
  4. 4A bakery claims that the mass of a cake, on average, is 600 grams each. A random sample of 10 cakes is examined and the…
  5. 5Mr Dough's factory produces packets of flour for sale in local supermarkets packed in 2 sizes -- Regular-sized packets a…