In an examination, the score, , for paper 1 of a student is found to follow a normal distribution with mean 62 and standard deviation , and the score, , for paper 2 of a student is found to follow a normal distribution with mean 71 and standard deviation 8. The final score of a student for the examination is the average score of the 2 papers and it is assumed that and are independent random variables.
- (i)
Find the probability that for two randomly selected students and taking the examination for paper 2, has at most 2 marks less than the marks of .
- (ii)
Given that 15% of the students have at least a final score of 75, find .
- (iii)
Using the value of found in part (ii), find the probability that a randomly selected student performs better in her Paper 1 than in her Paper 2.
- (iv)
Comment on the validity of the answer obtained in part (ii) and (iii).
It won't just hand you the answer — it asks where you're stuck.How the checker works
Worked solution
8(i)
1. Determine the distribution of the difference in scores between two randomly selected students.
Let and be the Paper 2 scores of students and respectively.
Since and they are independent randomly selected students,
2. Formulate the required inequality and calculate the probability.
The condition ' has at most marks less than ' translates to , which rearranges to .
8(ii)
1. Define the final score random variable and determine its mean and variance.
Let be the final score of a student. We are given .
Thus, .
2. Set up the probability equation for the final score.
We are given that of the students have at least a final score of , so:
3. Standardise the normal variable and use the inverse normal function to find the corresponding $Z$-value.
Standardising the variable to :
Using the inverse normal distribution (area to the left is ):
4. Solve for the standard deviation $\sigma$.
8(iii)
1. Calculate $\sigma$ and the variance of the combined scores from the context in part (ii).
Since the value of is needed, we must first determine it from the given conditions in part (ii).
Let be the sum of scores. The final score is .
We are given , which means .
Standardising the distribution:
From the graphing calculator, the -value for the upper is .
2. Define the distribution for the difference in scores between Paper 1 and Paper 2.
Let represent the difference in scores between Paper 1 and Paper 2.
Since and are independent random variables:
From our previous calculation, we already found that .
Therefore, .
3. Calculate the probability that the student performs better in Paper 1.
A student performs better in Paper 1 if , which translates to .
Using the graphing calculator:
Rounding to 3 significant figures, the probability is .
8(iv)
1. State whether the answers are valid and explain the realistic relationship between the two variables.
The answers obtained are likely invalid.
This is because the calculation relies on the assumption that and are independent. In reality, this assumption is unrealistic as a single student's performance in Paper 1 and Paper 2 of the same examination are likely to be dependent (e.g., positively correlated).
The answers are likely invalid. The assumption that and are independent is unrealistic, as a student's scores in Paper 1 and Paper 2 are likely to be dependent (positively correlated).
AI analysis — may contain mistakes.
Worked this one out on paper? Snap your steps and Gigle's AI math checker will circle the step where it went wrong.
More questions on this topic
- 1Section B: Statistics [60 marks] A manager claims that the time spent by each customer at his supermarket follows a norm…
- 2In this question you should state the parameters of any distributions that you use. Crispy Cream Donut Shop sells 2 type…
- 3 is a normal random variable with mean 1 and variance 1, and is also a normal random variable with mean and…
- 4A credit card company has a special 24-hour telephone hotline for customers to either report a lost credit card or to re…
- 5Fishing Company A has two types of fishing vessels, the "Standard" vessel and the "Large" vessel. The amount of fish cau…