Over a period of one month, the increase in heights of orchid plants in a nursery has mean 1.34 cm and standard deviation 0.24 cm. Soothing music is introduced in the nursery and one month later, the increase in heights, cm, is measured for a random sample of 55 orchid plants. A test is carried out, at the 5% level of significance, to determine whether there has been a significant improvement in the increase in heights of the orchid plants.
- ((i))
State appropriate hypotheses for the test and giving a reason, state if any assumption is needed for the test to be valid.
- ((ii))
Find the set of values of for which the result of the test would be not to reject the null hypothesis.
- ((iii))
Explain what is meant by 'at the 5% level of significance' in the context of this question.
It won't just hand you the answer — it asks where you're stuck.How the checker works
Worked solution
5((i))
1. State the appropriate null and alternative hypotheses.
Let be the population mean increase in heights of the orchid plants after soothing music is introduced.
The test is to determine if there has been an improvement (which corresponds to an increase in heights), so we use a one-tailed test:
2. Determine if any assumption is needed and provide a reason based on the sample size.
No assumption about the population distribution (e.g. assuming it is normally distributed) is needed.
Reason: Since the sample size is large (), by the Central Limit Theorem, the distribution of the sample mean is approximately normal regardless of the population's distribution.
Let be the population mean increase in heights of the orchid plants, in cm.
No assumption about the population distribution is needed. Since the sample size is large (), by the Central Limit Theorem, the sample mean is approximately normally distributed.
5((ii))
1. Identify the condition for not rejecting the null hypothesis based on the critical $z$-value.
From part (i), this is a right-tailed test ().
At the level of significance, the critical value is .
To not reject , the test statistic must not fall in the critical region, so we require:
2. Set up the inequality using the standard test statistic formula for the sample mean.
Substitute into the inequality:
3. Solve for $\bar{x}$.
Therefore, the set of values is (to 3 s.f.).
(to 3 s.f.)
5((iii))
1. State the meaning of the level of significance in the specific context of the question.
The level of significance is the probability of rejecting the null hypothesis when is actually true.
In this context, represents the scenario where the mean increase in height is 1.34 cm (no improvement), and rejecting it means concluding there is an improvement.
Therefore, a 5% level of significance means there is a 5% probability of concluding that there is a significant improvement in the increase in heights of the orchid plants, when in fact there is no improvement.
It means there is a 5% probability of concluding that there is a significant improvement in the increase in heights of the orchid plants, when in fact there is no improvement (the mean increase in height remains 1.34 cm).
AI analysis — may contain mistakes.
Worked this one out on paper? Snap your steps and Gigle's AI math checker will circle the step where it went wrong.
More questions on this topic
- 1A nutritionist claims that the mean number of calories in an energy bar is 350 cal. The nutritionist collected and measu…
- 2The owner of Eng Choo Farm claims that the eggs produced at his farm has an average cholesterol content of mg pe…
- 3A study found that students at the National University of Singapore and the Nanyang Technological University sleep a…
- 4A bakery claims that the mass of a cake, on average, is 600 grams each. A random sample of 10 cakes is examined and the…
- 5Mr Dough's factory produces packets of flour for sale in local supermarkets packed in 2 sizes -- Regular-sized packets a…