A sequence is such that and
- (i)
Express in partial fractions. Hence find in terms of .
- (ii)
By considering and using the result in part (i), show that
- (iii)
Using the result in part (i), find in terms of .
It won't just hand you the answer — it asks where you're stuck.How the checker works
Worked solution
2(i)
1. Express the rational function in partial fractions.
Let .
Substituting , we get .
Substituting , we get .
Therefore, .
2. Split the summation and evaluate the arithmetic sequence portion.
For the first sum, it is an arithmetic progression. Using the sum formula for an AP or standard sum formula:
3. Evaluate the second summation using the method of differences.
Since intermediate terms cancel out in pairs, we are left with the first and last terms:
4. Combine the evaluated parts to reach the final expression.
Total sum
;
2(ii)
1. Concisely obtain the sum evaluated in part (i), as it is required for the target.
From part (i), we use the partial fractions to evaluate the sum:
2. Rearrange the given recurrence relation to express $u_r - u_{r-1}$ and sum both sides from $r=1$ to $n$.
From the given recurrence relation, replace with and rearrange:
Taking the sum from to on both sides:
3. Evaluate the left-hand side using the Method of Differences.
Notice that all intermediate terms cancel out, leaving only the first and last terms:
4. Substitute the given value of $u_0$ and the evaluated sum from part (i) to complete the proof.
Equating the evaluated left side and right side sums:
Substitute the given initial condition :
2(iii)
1. Evaluate the result of the sum from part (i) as it is required for this part.
2. Rewrite the target sum by shifting the index to relate it to the sum in part (i).
Let . When , ; when , .
3. Substitute the evaluated sum from part (i) and simplify.
AI analysis — may contain mistakes.
Worked this one out on paper? Snap your steps and Gigle's AI math checker will circle the step where it went wrong.