A firm claims that, on average, their workers spend no more than 8 hours a day at the construction site. The amount of time clocked, hours, by each worker from a random sample of 150 workers, is summarised as follows. Test, at the 1% significance level, whether the firm's claim is valid.
It won't just hand you the answer — it asks where you're stuck.How the checker works
Worked solution
7
1. State the hypotheses.
Let be the population mean time clocked by workers, in hours.
Significance level:
2. Calculate the sample mean and unbiased estimate of the population variance.
Sample mean,
Unbiased estimate of population variance,
3. Determine the test statistic and compute the $p$-value.
Under , since the sample size is large, by the Central Limit Theorem, is approximately normally distributed.
Test statistic:
Using a graphing calculator (1-tail -test):
(to 3 s.f.)
4. State the conclusion in the context of the problem.
Since , we reject .
There is sufficient evidence at the level of significance to conclude that the population mean time clocked is more than hours. Therefore, the firm's claim is not valid.
Reject . The firm's claim is not valid.
AI analysis — may contain mistakes.
Worked this one out on paper? Snap your steps and Gigle's AI math checker will circle the step where it went wrong.
More questions on this topic
- 1A nutritionist claims that the mean number of calories in an energy bar is 350 cal. The nutritionist collected and measu…
- 2The owner of Eng Choo Farm claims that the eggs produced at his farm has an average cholesterol content of mg pe…
- 3A study found that students at the National University of Singapore and the Nanyang Technological University sleep a…
- 4A bakery claims that the mass of a cake, on average, is 600 grams each. A random sample of 10 cakes is examined and the…
- 5Mr Dough's factory produces packets of flour for sale in local supermarkets packed in 2 sizes -- Regular-sized packets a…