Under normal continuous use, the average battery life of a PI-99 calculator is claimed to be hours. A random sample of 13 calculators were obtained, and the battery life, hours, of each calculator was measured. The results are summarised by
- (i)
Find unbiased estimates of the population mean and variance.
- (ii)
A test is to be carried out at the 5% level of significance to determine if the claim made is valid.
State a necessary assumption to carry out the test.
- (iii)
State the appropriate hypotheses for the test, defining any symbols that you use.
- (iv)
Find the set of values of for which the result of the test would be that the null hypothesis is not rejected. Leave all numerical answers in 2 decimal places.
It won't just hand you the answer — it asks where you're stuck.How the checker works
Worked solution
8(i)
1. Calculate the unbiased estimate of the population mean
The unbiased estimate of the population mean is given by .
2. Calculate the unbiased estimate of the population variance
The unbiased estimate of the population variance is given by .
Unbiased estimate of population mean (3 s.f.)
Unbiased estimate of population variance (3 s.f.)
8(ii)
1. State the assumption required because of the small sample size
Since the sample size is small (), the Central Limit Theorem cannot be applied to assume the distribution of the sample mean is approximately normal. Therefore, for the test to be valid, we must assume that the underlying population (battery life of the PI-99 calculators) follows a normal distribution.
The battery life of the PI-99 calculators follows a normal distribution.
8(iii)
1. Define the population parameter.
Let be the population mean battery life of the PI-99 calculator in hours.
2. State the null and alternative hypotheses.
Since the test is to determine if the claim of is valid, we use a two-tailed test.
where is the population mean battery life of the PI-99 calculator in hours.
8(iv)
1. Recall the sample mean and the unbiased estimate of the population variance from part (i).
From part (i),
2. Set up the non-rejection region for the test statistic at the 5% level of significance.
For a two-tailed test at the 5% significance level, the null hypothesis is not rejected if the test statistic lies within the non-critical region:
Assuming the sample variance is an appropriate estimate for the population variance , the test statistic is .
3. Solve the inequality to find the set of values for $k$.
Rounding to 2 decimal places, we get:
AI analysis — may contain mistakes.
Worked this one out on paper? Snap your steps and Gigle's AI math checker will circle the step where it went wrong.
More questions on this topic
- 1A nutritionist claims that the mean number of calories in an energy bar is 350 cal. The nutritionist collected and measu…
- 2The owner of Eng Choo Farm claims that the eggs produced at his farm has an average cholesterol content of mg pe…
- 3A bakery claims that the mass of a cake, on average, is 600 grams each. A random sample of 10 cakes is examined and the…
- 4An electrical appliance supplier is investigating the potential impact of monthly advertisement expenditure, denoted as…
- 5Mr Dough's factory produces packets of flour for sale in local supermarkets packed in 2 sizes -- Regular-sized packets a…