Prove that Hence find .
- (a)
Deduce the value of .
- (b)
Show that .
It won't just hand you the answer — it asks where you're stuck.How the checker works
Worked solution
4(a)
1. Relate the new summand to the earlier expression by considering a shift in the index.
Let the term from the previous part be .
Substituting with , we get:
This exactly matches the summand in the target sum for .
2. Rewrite the target series using the change of index and the sum result from the previous part.
From the 'Hence' part, we know .
The required sum is .
Letting , the limits change from and :
Using our known sum formula, substituting for the upper limit:
4(b)
1. Relate the required inequality to the exact series sum found in the earlier part.
From the earlier part, we established that:
To prove that , we can compare the general terms of the two sums. It suffices to show that for all :
2. Compare the denominators by bounding the square root expressions.
Observe that for , we can bound the terms in the denominator of the right-hand expression:
Since , we have , which strictly implies .
Also, . Since , we have .
Adding these two inequalities together gives:
3. Deduce the inequality for the general terms and sum them to complete the proof.
Since for all , taking the reciprocal reverses the inequality:
Multiplying both sides by (which is strictly positive) gives:
Summing both sides from to yields:
Substituting the exact sum evaluated earlier into the right-hand side, we obtain:
\text{Shown}
AI analysis — may contain mistakes.
Worked this one out on paper? Snap your steps and Gigle's AI math checker will circle the step where it went wrong.