A manufacturer claims that the mean lifetime of the light bulbs he produces is at least 1200 hours. A random sample of 120 bulbs is taken and the lifetime per bulb, x hours, is measured. The results are summarised by and .
- (i)
Find unbiased estimates of the population mean and variance.
- (ii)
Test the manufacturer's claim at the 10% significance level.
- (iii)
The same manufacturer makes a change in the process which is intended to improve the average lifetime. A random sample of 20 bulbs is taken from the output of the new process. The mean and standard deviation of this sample are hours and hours respectively. A test at the 5% significance level indicates that the manufacturer's claim is valid for this improved process.
Stating a necessary assumption, find the least possible value of , giving your answer correct to 3 decimal places.
It won't just hand you the answer — it asks where you're stuck.How the checker works
Worked solution
12(i)
1. Calculate the unbiased estimate of the population mean.
2. Calculate the unbiased estimate of the population variance.
Mean:
Variance: (or )
12(ii)
1. State the null and alternative hypotheses.
Let be the population mean lifetime of the light bulbs, in hours.
The manufacturer claims that .
2. Recall the unbiased estimates from part (i) and state the test statistic.
From part (i), the unbiased estimates are:
Since the sample size is large, by the Central Limit Theorem, the sample mean is approximately normally distributed. The test statistic is:
3. Calculate the test statistic and $p$-value.
Using a graphing calculator with , , , and :
4. State the conclusion in the context of the question.
Since the -value , we reject .
There is sufficient evidence at the level of significance to conclude that the mean lifetime of the light bulbs is less than . Therefore, the manufacturer's claim is not valid.
Since the -value () is less than , we reject . There is sufficient evidence at the significance level to conclude that the mean lifetime of the light bulbs is less than . Hence, the manufacturer's claim is not valid.
12(iii)
1. State the necessary assumption and the hypotheses for the test.
Necessary assumption: The lifetime of the light bulbs produced by the new process follows a normal distribution.
Let be the population mean lifetime of the bulbs.
The manufacturer's claim is that .
2. Calculate the unbiased estimate of the population variance.
Given the standard deviation of the sample is , the sample variance is .
The unbiased estimate of the population variance is:
3. Set up the test statistic and state the condition for not rejecting the null hypothesis.
Under , the test statistic is:
Since the test indicates the manufacturer's claim is valid, we do not reject at the 5% level of significance.
The critical region for this 1-tailed test is .
For not to be rejected, the test statistic must lie outside the critical region:
4. Solve the inequality to find the least possible value of $k$.
Therefore, the least possible value of is (correct to 3 decimal places).
Assumption: The lifetime of the light bulbs produced by the new process follows a normal distribution.
Least possible value of
AI analysis — may contain mistakes.
Worked this one out on paper? Snap your steps and Gigle's AI math checker will circle the step where it went wrong.
More questions on this topic
- 1A nutritionist claims that the mean number of calories in an energy bar is 350 cal. The nutritionist collected and measu…
- 2The owner of Eng Choo Farm claims that the eggs produced at his farm has an average cholesterol content of mg pe…
- 3A bakery claims that the mass of a cake, on average, is 600 grams each. A random sample of 10 cakes is examined and the…
- 4An electrical appliance supplier is investigating the potential impact of monthly advertisement expenditure, denoted as…
- 5Mr Dough's factory produces packets of flour for sale in local supermarkets packed in 2 sizes -- Regular-sized packets a…