Prove by the method of mathematical induction that Hence find Deduce that
It won't just hand you the answer — it asks where you're stuck.How the checker works
Worked solution
8((i))
1. State the proposition and prove it is true for the base case $n=2$.
Let be the proposition that .
For ,
Since LHS = RHS, is true.
2. State the inductive hypothesis for $n=k$.
Assume is true for some integer , i.e.,
3. Write the sum for $n=k+1$ and substitute the inductive hypothesis.
We want to show that is true.
For ,
4. Combine the fractions algebraically over a common denominator.
5. Factorise the numerator to cancel with the denominator, matching the form for $P_{k+1}$, and write the conclusion.
Hence, is true.
Since is true, and , by Mathematical Induction, is true for all integers .
Proof completed. (See steps for full working)
8((ii))
1. Apply an index substitution to match the required sum with the sum from part (i).
Let . When , . When , .
2. Isolate the first term to match the summation limits, then apply the formula from part (i).
Using the result from (i) with replaced by :
3. Simplify the fractions to obtain the final expression.
8((iii))
1. Evaluate the sum in part (ii), which is required for the deduction.
From part (ii), we need to evaluate .
Isolating the term and re-indexing the rest with :
Using the result from (i) with replaced by :
2. Establish an inequality relating the general terms of the series in (iii) and (ii).
Notice the relationship between the denominators:
Since for all , taking the reciprocal gives:
3. Apply the inequality to the sum and substitute the result from part (ii).
Summing both sides from to :
Substitute the expression found for part (ii):
4. Conclude the proof by showing the subtracted algebraic fraction is strictly positive.
For , we have , , and .
Thus, , which means:
Therefore,
As shown in the working.
AI analysis — may contain mistakes.
Worked this one out on paper? Snap your steps and Gigle's AI math checker will circle the step where it went wrong.