To reduce the number of speeding incidents on the road, traffic police in Country S set up traffic cameras at 3 busy traffic Junctions A, B and C to monitor the speeds of vehicles passing through these junctions. The average number of speeding vehicles caught by the camera at Junctions A, B and C are 2 in every 3 hours, 5 in every 4 hours and λ\lambda in every hour respectively. It is assumed that the number of speeding vehicles caught by the cameras at the three junctions followed Poisson distributions.

  1. (a)

    Find the probability that there are at least 2 speeding vehicles caught at Junctions A and B in an hour.

  2. (b)

    Given that there are 2 speeding vehicles caught at the three junctions in an hour, find the probability that at least one speeding vehicle caught is at Junction C. Leave your answer in terms of λ\lambda.

  3. (c)

    Given that the traffic cameras are in operation 24 hours in a day, using a suitable approximation, find the probability that there will be more speeding vehicles caught at Junction A than at Junction B in a day. State an assumption for the calculation to be valid.

Work through it with AI →

It won't just hand you the answer — it asks where you're stuck.How the checker works

Worked solution

9(a)

1. Define the combined random variable for the number of vehicles caught at Junctions A and B in an hour.

Let XX and YY be the number of speeding vehicles caught at Junctions A and B in an hour respectively.
X∼Po(23)X \sim \text{Po}(\frac{2}{3})
Y∼Po(54)Y \sim \text{Po}(\frac{5}{4})
Assuming the number of vehicles caught at each junction are independent, let W=X+YW = X + Y be the total number of vehicles caught at both junctions.
W∼Po(23+54)W \sim \text{Po}(\frac{2}{3} + \frac{5}{4})
W∼Po(2312)W \sim \text{Po}(\frac{23}{12})

2. Calculate the probability of at least 2 speeding vehicles being caught.

P(W≥2)=1−P(W≤1)\text{P}(W \ge 2) = 1 - \text{P}(W \le 1)
P(W≥2)=1−(P(W=0)+P(W=1))\text{P}(W \ge 2) = 1 - \left( \text{P}(W = 0) + \text{P}(W = 1) \right)
P(W≥2)=1−e−2312(1+2312)\text{P}(W \ge 2) = 1 - e^{-\frac{23}{12}} \left( 1 + \frac{23}{12} \right)
P(W≥2)≈1−0.42903≈0.571 (to 3 s.f.)\text{P}(W \ge 2) \approx 1 - 0.42903 \approx 0.571 \text{ (to 3 s.f.)}

Answer

0.5710.571

9(b)

1. Define the Poisson parameters for each junction and the combined parameter for Junctions A and B.

Let XAX_A, XBX_B, and XCX_C be the number of speeding vehicles caught in an hour at Junctions A, B, and C respectively.
XA∼Po(23)X_A \sim \text{Po}\left(\frac{2}{3}\right)
XB∼Po(54)X_B \sim \text{Po}\left(\frac{5}{4}\right)
XC∼Po(λ)X_C \sim \text{Po}(\lambda)
Let W=XA+XBW = X_A + X_B be the number of speeding vehicles caught at Junctions A and B in an hour.
Assuming independence, the sum follows a Poisson distribution:
W∼Po(23+54)⇒W∼Po(2312)W \sim \text{Po}\left(\frac{2}{3} + \frac{5}{4}\right) \Rightarrow W \sim \text{Po}\left(\frac{23}{12}\right)

2. Formulate the required conditional probability using the complement rule.

Let Y=W+XCY = W + X_C be the total vehicles caught at all three junctions in an hour, so Y∼Po(2312+λ)Y \sim \text{Po}\left(\frac{23}{12} + \lambda\right).
We need to find P(XC≥1∣Y=2)P(X_C \ge 1 \mid Y = 2).
Using the complement rule:
P(XC≥1∣Y=2)=1−P(XC=0∣Y=2)P(X_C \ge 1 \mid Y = 2) = 1 - P(X_C = 0 \mid Y = 2)
By the definition of conditional probability:
P(XC=0∣Y=2)=P(XC=0∩Y=2)P(Y=2)=P(XC=0∩W=2)P(Y=2)P(X_C = 0 \mid Y = 2) = \frac{P(X_C = 0 \cap Y = 2)}{P(Y = 2)} = \frac{P(X_C = 0 \cap W = 2)}{P(Y = 2)}

3. Calculate the constituent probabilities and simplify the final expression.

Since XCX_C and WW are independent, P(XC=0∩W=2)=P(XC=0)P(W=2)P(X_C = 0 \cap W = 2) = P(X_C = 0)P(W = 2):
P(XC=0)=e−λP(X_C = 0) = \text{e}^{-\lambda}
P(W=2)=e−2312(2312)22!P(W = 2) = \text{e}^{-\frac{23}{12}} \frac{\left(\frac{23}{12}\right)^2}{2!}
P(Y=2)=e−(2312+λ)(2312+λ)22!P(Y = 2) = \text{e}^{-\left(\frac{23}{12} + \lambda\right)} \frac{\left(\frac{23}{12} + \lambda\right)^2}{2!}
Substituting these into the conditional probability ratio:
P(XC=0∣Y=2)=e−λ⋅e−2312(2312)22e−(2312+λ)(2312+λ)22=(2312)2(2312+λ)2=(231223+12λ12)2=(2312λ+23)2\begin{aligned} P(X_C = 0 \mid Y = 2) &= \frac{\text{e}^{-\lambda} \cdot \text{e}^{-\frac{23}{12}} \frac{\left(\frac{23}{12}\right)^2}{2}}{\text{e}^{-\left(\frac{23}{12} + \lambda\right)} \frac{\left(\frac{23}{12} + \lambda\right)^2}{2}} \\ &= \frac{\left(\frac{23}{12}\right)^2}{\left(\frac{23}{12} + \lambda\right)^2} \\ &= \left( \frac{\frac{23}{12}}{\frac{23 + 12\lambda}{12}} \right)^2 \\ &= \left( \frac{23}{12\lambda + 23} \right)^2 \end{aligned}
Therefore, the required probability is:
P(XC≥1∣Y=2)=1−(2312λ+23)2P(X_C \ge 1 \mid Y = 2) = 1 - \left( \frac{23}{12\lambda + 23} \right)^2

Answer

1−(2312λ+23)21 - \left( \frac{23}{12\lambda + 23} \right)^2

9(c)

1. Determine the distribution of the number of speeding vehicles caught at Junctions A and B in a day.

Let AA and BB be the number of speeding vehicles caught in a 24-hour day at Junction A and Junction B respectively.
For Junction A: λA=24×23=16\lambda_A = 24 \times \frac{2}{3} = 16
For Junction B: λB=24×54=30\lambda_B = 24 \times \frac{5}{4} = 30
Thus, A∼Po(16)A \sim \text{Po}(16) and B∼Po(30)B \sim \text{Po}(30).

2. State the normal approximations for $A$ and $B$.

Since λA=16>10\lambda_A = 16 > 10 and λB=30>10\lambda_B = 30 > 10, the Poisson distributions can be approximated by Normal distributions:
A∼N(16,16)A \sim \text{N}(16, 16) approximately.
B∼N(30,30)B \sim \text{N}(30, 30) approximately.

3. Find the distribution of the difference $A - B$.

Let W=A−BW = A - B.
Assuming AA and BB are independent,
E(W)=E(A)−E(B)=16−30=−14\text{E}(W) = \text{E}(A) - \text{E}(B) = 16 - 30 = -14
Var(W)=Var(A)+Var(B)=16+30=46\text{Var}(W) = \text{Var}(A) + \text{Var}(B) = 16 + 30 = 46
Therefore, W∼N(−14,46)W \sim \text{N}(-14, 46) approximately.

4. Apply a continuity correction to find the required probability.

We require P(A>B)\text{P}(A > B), which is equivalent to P(A−B>0)\text{P}(A - B > 0).
Since A−BA - B takes integer values, P(A−B>0)=P(A−B≥1)\text{P}(A - B > 0) = \text{P}(A - B \ge 1).
Applying the continuity correction for the normal approximation, we calculate P(W>0.5)\text{P}(W > 0.5).
Using a graphing calculator:
P(W>0.5)≈0.016263≈0.0163\text{P}(W > 0.5) \approx 0.016263 \approx 0.0163 (to 3 s.f.)

5. State the necessary assumption for the calculation to be valid.

Assumption: The number of speeding vehicles caught at Junction A and the number caught at Junction B are independent of each other (this is required to sum their variances).

Answer

0.01630.0163
Assumption: The number of speeding vehicles caught at Junction A is independent of the number of speeding vehicles caught at Junction B.

AI analysis — may contain mistakes.

Worked this one out on paper? Snap your steps and Gigle's AI math checker will circle the step where it went wrong.

More questions on this topic

  1. 1The events AA and BB are such that P(B)=13\mathrm{P}(B) = \frac{1}{3}, P(A∣B)=25\mathrm{P}(A|B) = \frac{2}{5} and P(A∪B)=35\mathrm{P}(A \cup B) = \frac{3}{5}…
  2. 2Two brothers Kai and Leo are duathlon (running and cycling) athletes who train regularly. For each day, the probability…
  3. 3A pair of siblings, Abbey and Betty, went to a book fair with six other friends. The eight of them stood in a queue in r…
  4. 4A particular disease is known to infect approximately 1 in every 10 000 people. A test for this disease is 99.9% accurat…
  5. 5Events AA and BB are such that P(A)=0.7P(A)=0.7 and P(B)=0.8P(B)=0.8. Show that P(A∩B)≥0.5P(A \cap B) \ge 0.5 If P(A′ ∪ B)=0.85P(A'\ \cup\ B)=0.85,…